Bextra Class Action Lawsuits Bextra Class Action Lawsuits Information

Bextra Class Action Lawsuits

Legal Information Home       |       Attorneys & Lawyers Directory       |       Legal Information Resources

Bextra Class Action Lawsuits Information

Bextra is a prescription medication approved by the FDA in November 2001 to treat the severe pain associated with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and primary dysmenorrhea (painful menstrual cramping). Over 23 million Americans suffer from some form of arthritis. Because there is no cure for arthritis, pain medications like Bextra are available to treat the pain associated with this disease. Bextra is manufactured by pharmaceutical company Pfizer and has come under significant scrutiny since a similar drug was pulled from the market.

COX-2 selective medicines were developed to treat pain without causing the significant gastrointestinal side effects that are associated with non-selective pain medications such as naproxen and ibuprofen. Controversy over the safety of COX-2 selective pain medications began when a drug similar to Bextra, called Vioxx (from Merck), was recalled on September 30, 2004 after studies concluded that taking Vioxx for a period of eighteen months or more doubled a patients risk of suffering from heart attack or stroke.

Since the Vioxx recall, the cardiovascular safety other COX-2 selective drugs has come into question. There have been no substantiated reports documented in medical journals or confirmed by independent researchers that have concluded that Bextra use poses an increased risk of cardiovascular problems.

Bextra cardiovascular safety was covered in an American Heart Association meeting in early November 2004. Studies reported at this conference indicated an increased risk in heart complications for patients taking Bextra who undergo cardiac bypass surgery. In response to these reports, and the general scrutiny surrounding COX-2 inhibitors, Pfizer announced in mid October 2004 that plans are underway to study the long term cardiovascular effects of Bextra.

The FDA and Pfizer are negotiating the inclusion of a black box warning (the FDA's highest alert category) on all Bextra labeling to disclose information about the risks of developing serious skin diseases caused by taking Bextra. The FDA acknowledged twenty cases of serious skin diseases caused by Bextra at the time of its approval.

Bextra is known to cause a rare but deadly skin disease called Stevens-Johnson syndrome as well as toxic epidermal necrolysis. Severe allergic reactions (including anaphylactic shock) have also been associated with Bextra use. Common side effects of taking Bextra include- but are not limited to- indigestion, headache, stomach pain, nausea and diarrhea. It is still unclear whether taking Bextra poses any threat to cardiovascular health.

If you are concerned about the side effects of Bextra or have experienced any adverse health symptoms, you should speak with a medical professional who can help. If you have suffered injury as a result of taking Bextra, you may wish to contact a legal professional who can advise you of your legal rights and options in a case to recover your damages.

Bextra Side Effects

There are a few serious Bextra side effects that people who are considering, or currently taking this drug, should be aware of. Bextra is a COX-2 selective non-steroidal anti inflammatory drug (NSAID). Bextra was approved by the FDA in November 2001 to treat osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and the severe pain associated with menstrual cramping. Even at the time of Bextra's approval, serious Bextra side effects were already being reported.

At the time of approval, the FDA acknowledged at least twenty cases of Bextra side effects that resulted in serious skin problems. Stevens-Johnson syndrome, a severe inflammatory eruption of the skin and mucous membranes, is one of the rare but serious Bextra side effects.

Toxic epidermal necrolysis, a syndrome in which large portions of the skin become red and peels much like a second degree burn, is another of the potentially serious Bextra side effects. Severe anaphylactic shock and allergic reaction are also potential Bextra side effects.

The FDA is currently considering the addition of a black box warning, the agency's strongest alert, on all Bextra labeling warning of serious Bextra side effects. Bextra's manufacturer, Pfizer, disclosed warnings on product labeling in 2002 regarding serious skin Bextra side effects. The black box warning would make information on Bextra side effects more prominent and visible to consumers.

Bextra side effects may also include indigestion, abdominal pain, nausea, diarrhea, and headache, discolored or bloody stools, unexplained weight gain, jaundice, flu-like symptoms, unusual bruising or bleeding, and water retention. If you experience any of these Bextra side effects, you should notify your doctor immediately.

Bextra side effects have been the topic of significant controversy in late 2004, after the recall of a similar drug called Vioxx. Merck pulled Vioxx from the market in September 2004 when studies indicated that patients taking Vioxx had an increased chance of suffering from a serious heart attack or cerebrovascular accident (stroke). The cardiovascular safety of all COX-2 selective drugs has come into question since this recall.

There is talk that Bextra side effects may also include cardiovascular risks. Pfizer claims that there have been no substantiated reports that indicate heart attack or stroke as potential Bextra side effects. The drug company has announced their plans to conduct long term studies of cardiovascular Bextra side effects.

More Bextra Information

The FDA determined in early April 2005 that the danger of Bextra was great enough to elicit the recall of this top-selling prescription pain reliever. On April 7, 2005 Pfizer announced the Bextra recall, stating that the danger of Bextra side effects greatly outweighed this drug's intended benefits. Information about the danger of Bextra has been mounting with exponential speed over the past few months, though the danger of Bextra has been known for years.

Bextra is a COX-2 selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) approved by the FDA in November 2001. Bextra, and other prescription COX-2 selective NSAIDs like Vioxx and Celebrex, were developed in the late 1990s to treat the pain associated with arthritis, menstrual cramps, and other chronic pain conditions. These drugs were originally designed to effectively treat pain without causing the gastrointestinal side effects associated with traditional NSAIDs like naproxen and ibuprofen.

The danger of Bextra use was discovered soon after this drug received FDA approval. Common side effects of Bextra included gastrointestinal complications similar to those caused by traditional NSAIDs. Fatal adverse skin reactions were among the first serious side effects revealing the true danger of Bextra. Bextra users began to develop a deadly disease known as Stevens Johnson syndrome. This potentially fatal danger of Bextra attacks the skin and mucous membranes, essentially burning the skin from the inside out, leading to death if not promptly and adequately treated.

Once this danger of Bextra became known, the FDA requested that Pfizer add stronger warnings to Bextra product information. In 2002 the FDA asked Pfizer to add a black box warning to all Bextra product patient information to inform patients about the danger of Bextra. A black box is the strongest warning the FDA can request, short of a drug recall. Despite government pressure, Pfizer failed to comply with this request and responsibly inform consumers about the danger of Bextra use.

In 2004 more new about the danger of Bextra was discovered. A Pfizer-sponsored clinical study was designed to evaluate the effects of Bextra on pain management after heart surgery. Those participants taking Bextra were twice as likely to suffer a stroke, heart attack, blood clot, or renal failure as compared to those in the control group. Despite this added danger of Bextra, Pfizer still maintained that their product was safe enough to remain on the market.

Strong evidence to the contrary prompted the FDA to ask doctors to prescribe Bextra only when necessary until the danger of Bextra was further evaluated. After a few months of investigation, the FDA finally announced that the danger of Bextra use was too great to allow this defective drug to remain on the market.

For more free legal information on known dangerous drugs and Class Action Lawsuits, please use the links below:

Free Legal Information Blog       |       Legal Articles       |       Free Legal Information